Welcome To MrMovieFiend!

Thank you for visiting MrMovieFiend! We take pride in everything that we do here, we do our best to write you movie reviews that may not agree to the norm because we don’t write reviews to agree with what people think, we give reviews in an honest movie goer’s opinion and are not afraid to tell you the readers what we really think!

Please enjoy all that our website has to offer, and as the days go on, the content increases so check back tomorrow for more reviews and other content!

Please check out the latest DVD releases you can purchase and have shipped to your house Latest DVD releases!

These releases include all new release movies such as the block buster films X-Men First Class, Green Lantern, and other smaller comedy films like the movie Everything Must Go, everything from indie films, action, adventure, comedy, horror, family friendly, or tv shows you can find all at that link!

Prometheus Review

Prometheus

Plot: The ship Prometheus lands on planet LV-223 in search of the answers to many of humanity’s biggest questions. What they find however, is something much more sinister; a secret alien race that threatens not only the members of Prometheus’ crew, but our entire world.

Thoughts: In 1979, Ridley Scott released his break-through sci-fi/horror masterpiece Alien; a moody and tension-ridden attack on the senses. Built upon the basis of a single crew encountering a single alien life force, the film became an almost instant classic, a landmark of science fiction cinema featuring some of the most memorable and terrifying scenes ever committed to celluloid. Scott followed this with the equally successful and legendary Blade Runner, another sci-fi tale on a bigger scale. Jump forward 30 years and this same man has seen his career dive and his respect dwindle, but could a return to the genre that proved his excellence initially be a way back to the top?

Prometheus was first noted as a prequel to Alien, before being taken down a notch to simply “sharing much of the same DNA” as Scott’s early masterwork. Whether this was noted simply to secure the masses of funding required will never be told, but what is clear is that there is a stable connection to the original Alien film here. But not in terms of quality.

With Prometheus, Scott takes the original premise of Alien and expands his horizons greatly, not only tripling the crew but also the set-sizes and the budget. It’s a large-scale, fantastically envisioned science fiction film through and through. Clunky cooling decks are replaced with plush open bridges, claustrophobic air vents are swapped for giant loading bays and the dank enclosing caverns are blown into gigantic tombs. True, this generates a great deal more scope for tremendous action-heavy set-pieces, but in doing so ultimately loses any sense of consistent fear or creeping closeness.

Instead of revving up the tension and stalking our well-groomed characters through their hellish journey, Scott attempts to widen his purview and answer enormous questions concerning the genesis of human life. Although an interesting direction to take, it falls flat by the simple fact that he just can’t decide where he’s going with it. Former Lost scribe Damon Lindelof bats the action back and forth between 2 rather tiring locations, attempting to question humanity and at the same time, play homage to Scott’s earlier masterpiece, creating an unforgiving mess as neither are handled particularly well.

The action sequences, although often shocking and at least once, disturbing, happen suddenly and without tension, creating short sharp scares but too infrequently to strike any lingering fear. The twisting plot takes many different turns, many often predictably dull and underwhelming and many others not leading anywhere at all. Random events occur, they dazzle, but they have no lasting effect on the tale as a whole, leaving a disappointing and underwhelming taste in the mouth.

Despite its plot-based flaws, Prometheus is very much a movie with style, utilising the latest technology to create a truly immersive and beautifully conceptualized future world. The 3D is handled with expert precision, not always being entirely necessary but lending a hand to the sheer scale and spectacle of the piece. Scott takes advantage of every new gadget the genre has to offer, not always finding the correct tone however. The film’s main antagonists, a collection of unknown alien life-forms, often appear un-menacing; their uncreative and rather bald exteriors never seeming to ignite the much needed flame of fear which Scott longs for so much.

The cast making up the crew of the good ship Prometheus are by far the most praise-worthy aspect of the film. Michael Fassbender truly steals the show as android David, an entire hidden world of broken feelings surfacing with the slightest hint of creepy to ensure his role is played to perfection. Idris Elba chews every bit of scenery in touching distance as Captain Janek and the delightful Rafe Spall holds his own rather marvelously amongst the Hollywood crowd.

Much of Scott’s direction appears however to be geared towards Noomi Rapace’s Elizabeth Shaw, his Ripley-substitute and main protagonist. Although feisty and perfectly capable of carrying the story alone, Rapace buckles under the weight of the superior talent around her; her performance perfectly suited for the character, but lacking any explosive or intriguing traits. But the most disabling misuse of the film comes from the role of the really rather talented Guy Pearce. A well established leading man, Pearce finds himself relegated to an extended cameo as Peter Weyland, the aging and greedy ship owner. Unfortunately, instead of utilising Pearce’s flexible range, Scott cakes him in poorly conceived old-man prosthetics leading to a few almost laughable exchanges and reducing the menace of the picture even further.

Overall, Prometheus is a disappointing case of style over substance. Ridley Scott attempts to recreate the bone-chilling tension of his early classic Alien but on a larger scale, failing to capture any sense of dread or logical understanding of events. The plot slops from one occurrence to the next and with simply too many characters to hold on to, the film collapses under the weight of Scott and Lindelof’s mistakes. Visually mesmerizing but lacking the intelligent and affecting execution it deserves.

3/5

The_Avengers

The Avengers

So, I made a post not long ago about how I saw The Avengers last night (or this morning depending on your view of things). I think it is safe to say that a lot of people have been looking forward to seeing this film. This has been in the making for a while. We had Iron Man, which lead to The Incredible Hulk, Thor, and Captain America. All of these Marvel films have been slowly building towards this point. It’s really genius. I’ll get into this some other time though. Point is, people have been waiting for this. It was either going to blow and not live up to the buildup, or it would be amazing. Which it is.

I feel like the first thing that I have to talk about is the cast. I mean that’s what makes this movie. So, The Avengers. Robert Downey Jr. is Tony Stark aka Iron Man. Honestly, nothing new here. Downey owns that role and doesn’t really look like he’s acting at all, which is probably why a number of his roles lately have had a similar attitude. He does a great job though. Stark does a great job being an ass in this film. He’s kinda the catalyst for a number of events whether intentionally or not. Whedon does kinda beat you over the head with “let’s transform Stark into an actual ‘hero’.” I guess his character does get some new development, though technically they all do. He was weird. There are some odd moments where he is sort of randomly helpful. I guess it’s a matter of how much you want to close read his role. You can easily look at him and think that it’s nothing new, but there are some little bits.

Next on the list (according to IMDB) is Chris Evans as Captain America. Evans manages to stand with the rest of the cast and hold his own. I wasn’t impressed though. He’s overshadowed by the rest of the cast. Evans manages to still give Rogers a presence on-screen. Captain America on the other hand is just sort of lame. Like Evans, he holds his own, but when you compare him to Hulk and Thor (who are complete badasses in this film) he’s not that impressive. I feel like he get’s pushed to the periphery quite a bit as well.

Mark Ruffalo replaces Edward Norton as Bruce Banner (I’m ignoring Eric Bana). I thought Norton did a decent job, but Ruffalo is a lot better. Different takes on the character though. This film also has a lot of humor, which I think Ruffalo does a good job of handling. He’s not constantly a grumpy dude (this is actually kind of explained later). Banner is actually incredibly important to the film. I’m not sure if part of this was done to give Ruffalo more fo a chance to strut his stuff or not. I’m not complaining though. The Hulk/Banner was easily the best in this film. Banner has some great lines as does the Hulk (yes he does speak a few times, but not Hulk Smash). The Hulk also has the best acting sequences. I mean he is the ultimate badass. Without him the Avengers would have been so screwed. After watching this, I really wish Ruffalo would have had his own film for the Hulk. Oh, and the Hulk looks great. He’s not twenty feet tall, but he’s not Lou Ferrigno. He’s nicely sized and he is not neon green. He looks nice and his face is great as well. Yes, it’s different as the Hulk, but it still retains the likeness to an extent of Ruffalo. That and you get some good emotion shown. His movements are also great to watch as well. Not just fighting, him walking around. They make him a bit ape like. Basically, the Hulk made this film on its own.

We still aren’t done. Chris Hemsworth returns as Thor. He’s absent early on, but quickly makes an appearance and he is nicely incorporated into the film. His appearance actually introduces some great scenes in the movie. Not to give too much away, but when he shows up Captain America and Iron Man and Thor all duke it out with each other (physically and verbally). It was amazing. It also sets the tone for the rest of the film. Hemsowrth is still bad ass as Thor. Personally, I’m torn between whether I like Thor or Hulk more. They are both easily in the top two though. I mean they are just AMAZING together (yes they have great scenes together!). Thor is pretty vital as well as far as giving some sage advice goes. He helps out the other characters a lot, more notably than Stark. This is a spoiler, but not much of one, so feel free to skip this sentence. Loki makes a number of comments about their “immortality” and I was really hoping they would do more with that. Thor does get a knife wound, but it never develops. It was a little, but after the comments Loki made, I was hoping that would crop up at some point. Anyways, Thor and Hulk need their own buddy film. Road trip with them or something.

Black Widow and Hawkeye are present. They both have some impressive scenes, but it’s hard to stand out once the others show up. Black Widow gets more development than Hawkeye and to be honest I wasn’t really impressed. Scarlett Johansson wasn’t horrible, but she wasn’t that good. Again, in comparison to the rest of the cast, didn’t hold up much. Hawkeye is just sort of there. He gets some interesting bits, but nothing overtly special. Once he starts into the action, he has some badass scenes with a bow. And yes there is a Legolas joke in the film.

Samuel L. Jackson of course returns as Nick Furry. Still a badass, and he does have a plain, of sorts. He gets a lot more screen time and he does have some action sequences. Clark Gregg also returns as Agent Coulson. Pay attention to him. Cobie Smulders also joins the cast as Agent Hill. I love Smulders. She’s great on HIMYM. Not overtly impressed with her here. She seemed very wooden. Maybe that was the point, but for whatever reason I was disappointed.

Tom Hiddleston holds his own as Loki. I mean compared to the entire Avengers team, you’d think he’d have a hard time having any sort of presence against them, but he does.

Anyways, the cast was amazing. They worked great together and the dynamic between the Avengers, and others was great. It was insane. I should probably move on now though.

Visually the movie kicks ass. I mean, I doubt that is a surprise to anyone, but after seeing Thor and Captain America, there really aren’t any surprises to how awesome this film is to watch. It’s great. I did not see it in 3D, however I get the impression that it would actually be pretty neat to see it in 3D. Unfortunately I’m very much against 3D as I wear glasses and they’ve yet to take that into account. The theater I was at had two viewings last night. One 3D and one not. The majority of the theater I was in were mostly my peers from the college and as I pointed out to my friend, most of the theater consisted of people wearing glasses (not the 3D kind).

The score was really good as well. Easy to miss in this film, but if you pay attention to it, it really helped. It clearly wasn’t distracting.

What else…The story? I’m not going to bother trying to hint at what happens exactly in the film. I mean The Avengers are not formed at the beginning. The Tesseract (originally the Cosmic Cube I believe) is stolen by Loki. SHIELD needs this back and Furry begins assembling the team. They don’t get along, shenanigans ensue. Oh, and Loki is not acting alone. It is well written and easy to follow. In fact I feel like someone who has not seen the other Marvel films would be able to sit down and watch this and still be able to understand what is going on. Whedon does a good job fo providing just enough back story to refresh viewers as well as informing those who may not have seen every film, or any.

This movie is also, HILARIOUS. Of course you have Stark’s comments. That’s expected. The rest of the cast all have their moments to shine and really, the humor really helps keep this movie going. A lot of the humour comes from bickering between the main cast and it is just a constant stream that keeps you lost in the film. I mean the pacing was great, but the constant use of humor really helped. It never felt like they were reaching for jokes. They just slide in nicely.

One downside to seeing this opening night is that I missed a lot of jokes. There are a lot of back and forth zingers between characters and the crowd would laugh at the first one and you’d miss the responses. It was worth it, but it does give me another excuse to go see the film again. Need to try to catch some of those missed lines.

Also, yes there is an easter egg. Unlike pervious films you do not have to sit and wait through all of the credits. They do the preliminary set (maybe five minutes long) and then you have it. It was really nice. You are introduced to someone. If you don’t know who it is, you can easily look it up online. People have already asked.

Anyways, this post is long enough. You should have the gist by now about how I feel. Great film. Easily the greatest Marvel film and I honestly think this stands up against Nolan’s Batman works. They are very much two different machines, but they are both amazing. To me, they both represent what comic book films should be. So, go see Avengers as soon as possible. I know I am going to.

You can check out more from me at Film Daze

increase YouTube views

2011 in Film: Bridesmaids, The Help, Midnight in Paris

I have not been able to post movie reviews here for quite a while. And since I owe you lots of movie reviews, here it goes.


Bridesmaids

Directed by: Paul Feig

Written by: Kristen Wiig, Annie Mumolo

Genre: Comedy

One of my new comfort movies.

Has there been any female-driven comedies that became as hilarious and as watchable as this one? I can’t reckon. What I am really sure of is that I really had a great time watching it. And I’m saying this on my seventh time of watching this film. Look at that.

The cast is excellent. Kristen Wiig leads this troop of ladies with full intelligence and humor that I can’t get over. Rose Byrne provides a very strong antagonist for Wiig’s character, showing off full finesse and class in her scenes. Melissa McCarthy is Megan. She moves around, delivers her lines, and lives in the character she is in. She is my favorite out of the five nominees in the Best Supporting Actress (along with Bejo, Spencer, and Chastain – what a strong line-up). The rest of the actors – Ellie Kemper, Wendi McLendon – Covey, Jill Clayburgh, Jon Hamm, and Chris O’ Dowd provide reliable performances that complete the film.

The film is directed quite well, the script is hilarious and emotional, the editing must be appreciated more, and the song choices are inspired.

Is it that extraordinary? No. But whatever, I love this film, it’s very watchable, I hope it got nominated for Best Picture, and I will certainly recommend this.

Rating: B+

 

 

 

The Help

Directed by: Tate Taylor

Written by: Tate Taylor

Genre: Drama

It may have been made to make money, obviously evident by the fact that it looks lightweight, but it took me by surprise – this movie has some of recent year’s scenes with real lot of heavy drama. Not the over-the-top outbursts, but the fact that the drama of some scenes are too real. Well, more of that later.

The direction is what the film needed. The screenplay actually has some cliches and sentimental traps of a light drama. The cinematography is capable, the editing is what the scenes required, the music is very good, the production design is fantastic, and so are the costumes.

So where’s the buzz coming from, anyway?

The performances.

Emma Stone is very good, Octavia Spencer is very effective, Jessica Chastain is almost magical, and Viola Davis is….. heartbreaking in every sense of the word. No, not one-dimensional. With the small time she is given (this is one of those fairly divided storylines), she was able to stand out from the rest. And about the Davis vs. Streep face-off at the Oscars, I am still undecided (that’s how good they were). Bryce Dallas Howard is deliciously evil, Sissy Spacek is hilarious, and Cicely Tyson gives one of the briefest heartbreaking performances that has ever appeared in the cinema. Five minutes, I guess, but she haunted me.

So, is there anything to get excited about? Maybe not. But here is a film with a lot of heart. We need that these days. I even watched it twice in a row.

Rating: A-

 

 

 

Midnight in Paris

Directed by: Woody Allen

Written by: Woody Allen

Genre: Romantic-Comedy / Fantasy

Truth be cleared: this is not Woody’s comeback. He’s never been that far, you know. See 2008 for Vicky Cristin Barcelona.

Going back to this, I really had some good time with this. It was light, yet it was smart – rare combination, by the way. The film all-in-all feels fresh, looks fresh, and is fresh. The direction makes the film very classy, very precise, and very delightful. The screenplay is fantastic. The cinematography should have gotten more notices, the editing is what the film needed, the music choices are amusing, the production design is pretty impressive, and they got some pretty good costumes.

The acting fares good, also. Owen Wilson does a very fine job as the leading man. We also have here some very good display of acting from Kathy Bates, Corey Stoll, Marion Cotillard, Adrien Brody, Mimi Kennedy, Rachel McAdams, and Michael Sheen.

It’s really a delightful, delightful, delightful film that uses nostalgia quite wisely to set up the atmosphere of the film. It’s not mindblowing, but you must see this.

Rating: A-

 

 

More 2011 movie reviews soon!

To read more of my blog posts, you can visit my blog The Final Oscar. Enjoy!

Tempting Providence: The Asphyx (1973)

Death is scary. Despite being inextricably bound with life, it has vexed and mystified humanity for as long as we’ve had the capacity to reflect and to wonder. One almost ubiquitous constant in all this grappling with Death through the ages has been a belief in some form of afterlife. (Of course, the afterlife isn’t always reassuring. The ancient Greeks believed that the “shades” of all those who had died dwelled in Hades, which was not a nice place at all.  Today, belief in a literal hell is still very high in the U.S. Interestingly, according to one survey, percentages of responders who absolutely did not believe in hell rose steadily the older — and closer to death — they got. [Baylor Religion Survey, 2007]

Perhaps because of the uncertainties of the afterlife, the concept of physical immortality has similarly captured the human imagination, at least since the Epic of Gilgamesh. In an earlier post on Count Yorga: Vampire, I speculated that at least some (if not most) of the staying power of the vampire in popular culture is due to the innate fascination with being young, sexy and powerful forever. Lately, science has titillated the public with research suggesting that the aging process can be slowed or even halted, or that we might someday be able to upload our consciousness into machines.

Poster - The Asphyx (1973)The Asphyx (1973) takes both the spiritual and material aspects of fascination with eternal life and combines them into a very interesting, quirky and horrific morality play. The film is set in the late 19th / early 20th century, a period marked by the industrial revolution and an explosion of inventions and scientific discoveries that upended traditional lifestyles and man’s conception of his place in the universe. Sir Hugo Cunningham (Robert Stephens) is a man of contradictions: as a patrician country squire, he represents the past and a declining aristocracy; on the other hand, he is a relentlessly curious scientist who’s invented his own movie camera and “light booster” (a fancy name for a spotlight). He’s also devoted himself to psychical research, and possibly proving, through scientific means, the existence of life after death.

Early in the film we see him giving a lecture to a group of fellow researchers. He shows them a series of slides of people at the moment of death. In each is a “smudge” seen hovering near the head of the dying person. Telling the group that he and others double-checked the film and processing, he makes a big leap: “What we have recorded is the soul departing the body at the moment of death!” The meeting ends with some convinced and others still skeptical.

Back at the country house, Sir Hugo’s fiancee Anna (Fiona Walker) has arrived to meet his family — eldest son Clive (Ralph Arliss), daughter Christina (Jane Lapotaire), and adopted son Giles (Robert Powell). Everyone’s happy that the long-time widower has found a new love. Sir Hugo commemorates the occasion by filming his loved ones boating around on a nearby lake. Tragedy strikes when Clive and Anna take their turn out on the lake. Sir Hugo cranks away with his movie camera as Clive maneuvers the canoe with a long pole. The pole gets stuck in the mud, and as Clive struggles with it, he fails to notice the canoe is quickly heading toward a low-hanging tree branch. He looks up just in time to get clobbered in the forehead. He falls into the water, the canoe overturns, and Anna, who can’t swim, goes in as well. Giles dives in to save the two, to no avail — the water’s too murky.

After the funeral, Giles is surprised to find his adoptive father processing the film of the accident. “I must see them again,” Sir Hugo says sadly. At the point that Clive hits his head on the branch, Sir Hugo stops cranking the projector. “The smudge!” he exclaims. Giles is baffled –  “What is it? It moved!” Sir Hugo excitedly compares the frame with the still pictures of the dying he’s taken for his psychical research. It’s exactly the same, but after examining the moving pictures, he realizes that his assumption of a soul or essence departing the body is all wrong. The smudge is actually moving towards his doomed son.

And here he makes another great leap. When Giles protests that they haven’t got the slightest clue what the manifestation might be, Sir Hugo turns thoughtful:

Don’t we? My researches into psychic phenomena show me that in Greek mythology, they refer to the spirit of Death… they called it the Asphyx. It manifests itself only in times of danger. Having existed in eternal agony, it seeks out the dying, or the damned, for only by possessing those about to die is it released from unspeakable torment!

Sir Hugo is a fascinating contradictory bundle of superstitious belief and dispassionate scientific method. Convinced that he’s on to something big, he becomes almost giddy thinking about how he might be able to further study the Asphyx, i.e., getting up close and personal with death. Giles sees that nothing good can come of this “scientific” study, but Sir Hugo is too full of himself to see the danger:

Giles: Tempting Providence is the pastime of fools!
Sir Hugo: And the destiny of the great.

Sir Hugo seems to have forgotten another important ancient Greek concept: hubris. And just like any good Greek tragedy, hubris proves to be the intrepid scientist’s undoing. Sir Hugo’s next close encounter with the Asphyx comes when he is enlisted by an upper-crust reformer colleague to film an upcoming public hanging. The colleague is outraged that public hangings are still taking place, and hopes that by filming this latest affront to decency, people will be so shocked and disgusted they will demand an end to executions (a dubious proposition at best). When Sir Hugo readily agrees to do it, the colleague has no clue to his underlying agenda, but Giles knows exactly what’s going on.

Closeup of the Asphyx

If you see this coming for you, put your affairs in order -- quick!

Sir Hugo drags the reluctant Giles to the execution to help with the equipment, but before the “festivities” begin, Giles stalks off in disgust. Sir Hugo starts cranking his camera. Just as the hangman is about to pull the lever, the sun goes under a cloud. Sir Hugo fires up his “light booster” to compensate just at the moment that the lever is pulled. As the condemned man falls through the trap, a screeching, spectral thing is caught in the beam right next to the hanged man — the Asphyx! The crowd gasps in horror at the spectre, and at the horrific fact that even though the prisoner’s neck is surely broken, he’s still alive and kicking. Sir Hugo shuts the beam off, the Asphyx is released, and the prisoner’s legs become still.

Even without the benefit of today’s CGI effects, this scene is a gut-wrencher. The Asphyx’s unearthly shrieks are a kind of hellish accompaniment to an awful “dance of death” — the horror really takes hold as the crowd realizes that a man who should be dead is not. Of course, Sir Hugo witnesses this too, and puts two and two together– death can be forestalled indefinitely if, at the moment the Asphyx comes to possess the dying, you can capture it in the beam of a “light booster”.

The next step is to test on an animal. Anna’s pet guinea pig is pressed into service. The trick is to subject the animal (or person) to immanent deadly danger, and trap the Asphyx at the precise moment that it comes to take possession of the dying body. The beam, which traps the spirit like a force field, can then be directed to a container with an identical light fed by a steady drip of special chemical compounds. Sir Hugo succeeds with the animal — even skeptical Giles is excited — and the rest is history… and tragedy.

After Sir Hugo traps his own Asphyx and “immortalizes” himself — with an electric chair of his own invention, and after a very close call in which he almost dies — he becomes completely obsessed, and insists that all the surviving members of his family be immortalized too. When I first saw The Asphyx, this is the point at which the film broke down for me. Rather than sticking with a proven method (his own electric chair), Sir Hugo devises ever more elaborate schemes — a guillotine and the world’s first gas chamber — in order to help his daughter and adopted son achieve immortality as he has.  I remember thinking at the time how contrived it all was.

Now, with a third viewing under my belt, I can better appreciate the film’s allegorical essence. Its brilliance lies in juxtaposing Sir Hugo’s monomaniacal obsession with trapping the Asphyx and gaining immortality with all the sundry, diabolical (and official) ways man has devised for ending human life. The film seems to be saying: any individual’s quest for immortality is hubristic and ill-advised and will end badly, but as a species we can achieve a kind of grace by affirming life rather than inventing new ways to kill.

Sir Hugo successfully traps the Asphyx while electrocuting himself

Do NOT try this at home!

The Asphyx might be a stretch for most viewers these days — there’s a lot of dialog and genteel manners and stuffy Edwardian drawing rooms, not to mention superimposed puppetry in place of CGI. But the film also features several intriguing, quasi-steampunk inventions, some unique, if off-the-wall ideas, and top notch acting, especially by the two Roberts (Stephens and Powell). Most importantly, it attempts to say something meaningful about the human condition — a rarity in today’s horror films.

The Rundown:

Marketplace News:  Redemption Films recently released a re-mastered version on Blu-ray and DVD.

For more reviews of obscure but worthwhile B horror and sci-fi films, see my blog, Films From Beyond the Time Barrier.

See also Films From Beyond on YouTube.